Re: Revisiting DTrace syscall provider

[Ryota Ozaki <ozaki-r%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost> wrote:
> On Mar 7,  6:11pm, ozaki-r%netbsd.org@localhost (Ryota Ozaki) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: Revisiting DTrace syscall provider
>
> | I first did so but I changed back to systrace because FreeBSD named it
> | systrace and named modules for syscall emulations as systrace_linux32
> | and systrace_freebsd32. If we follow so, we should keep systrace name as is?
>
> Seeing how much confusion "systrace" is causing I renamed it again:
>
>         dtrace_syscall
>         dtrace_syscall_netbsd32
>         dtrace_syscall_linux
>         ...

Yea, they're better than dtrace_systrace* :)

BTW please don't forget to rename its internal name.
(See http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/external/cddl/osnet/dev/fbt/fbt.c.diff?r1=1.17&r2=1.18&f=u
)

>
> | NP, please do it :)
>
> I am making one more change to make things even simpler than what FreeBSD
> did and save more space.

Thanks!
  ozaki-r

>
> Thanks,
>
> christos