Re: Revisiting DTrace syscall provider

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Mar 7,  6:11pm, ozaki-r%netbsd.org@localhost (Ryota Ozaki) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Revisiting DTrace syscall provider

| I first did so but I changed back to systrace because FreeBSD named it
| systrace and named modules for syscall emulations as systrace_linux32
| and systrace_freebsd32. If we follow so, we should keep systrace name as is?

Seeing how much confusion "systrace" is causing I renamed it again:

	dtrace_syscall
	dtrace_syscall_netbsd32
	dtrace_syscall_linux
	...

| NP, please do it :)

I am making one more change to make things even simpler than what FreeBSD
did and save more space.

Thanks,

christos