Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: NetBSD/amd64 current with HAVE_GCC=48
Committed.
ozaki-r
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Ryota Ozaki <ozaki-r%netbsd.org@localhost>
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Matt Thomas
> <matt%3am-software.com@localhost> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:35 PM, Ryota Ozaki <ozaki-r%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
>>
>>> The below patch should fix the error, but there may be another
>>> better solution.
>>>
>>> Anyone any ideas?
>>>
>>> ozaki-r
>>>
>>> Index: external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/dtrace/dtrace.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> RCS file:
>>> /cvs/cvsroot/src/external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/dtrace/dtrace.c,v
>>> retrieving revision 1.25
>>> diff -u -r1.25 dtrace.c
>>> --- external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/dtrace/dtrace.c 5 Mar 2014
>>> 20:14:15 -0000 1.25
>>> +++ external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/dtrace/dtrace.c 7 Mar 2014
>>> 00:28:47 -0000
>>> @@ -16682,6 +16682,7 @@
>>> cv_signal(&w->cv);
>>> mutex_exit(&w->lock);
>>> error = kthread_join(w->lwp);
>>> + (void) error; /* XXX gcc 4.8 */
>>> KASSERT(error == 0);
>>> cv_destroy(&w->cv);
>>> mutex_destroy(&w->lock);
>>
>> RCS file: /cvsroot/src/external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/dtrace/dtrace.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.25
>> diff -u -p -r1.25 dtrace.c
>> --- external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/dtrace/dtrace.c 5 Mar 2014 20:14:15
>> -0000 1.25
>> +++ external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/dtrace/dtrace.c 7 Mar 2014 01:17:11
>> -0000
>> @@ -16674,14 +16674,13 @@ dtrace_state_worker_add(void (*fn)(dtrac
>> void
>> dtrace_state_worker_remove(struct dtrace_state_worker *w)
>> {
>> - int error;
>>
>> KASSERT(!w->exiting);
>> mutex_enter(&w->lock);
>> w->exiting = true;
>> cv_signal(&w->cv);
>> mutex_exit(&w->lock);
>> - error = kthread_join(w->lwp);
>> + int error __diagused = kthread_join(w->lwp);
>> KASSERT(error == 0);
>> cv_destroy(&w->cv);
>> mutex_destroy(&w->lock);
>>
>
> Oh, I didn't know the attribute. I should read attribute(3)...
>
> BTW I think we don't need to move the definition of error.
>
> Thanks,
> ozaki-r
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index