Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: panic in Linux emulation [was Re: 6.99.32: panic when starting X]
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:32:05PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 10:41:06AM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > After updating from 6.99.31/20140215 to 6.99.31/20140221, I started X
> > and got a panic:
> >
> > fatal protection fault in supervisor mode
> > trap type 4 code 0 rip ffffffff808dbe2c cs 8 rflags 13286 cr2
> > ffff80023b989000 ilevel 0 rsp fffffe813ba2e9b0
> > curlwp 0xfffffe813ba139c0 pid 328.1 lowest kstack 0xfffffe813ba2b280
...
> > --- trap (number 4) ---
> > usb_allocmem_flags() at netbsd:usb_allocmem_flags+0x6c
> > ehci_allocm() at netbsd:ehci_allocm+0x2a
...
> > After a reboot I tried again (while logged in via ssh, not via the USB
> > keyboard like before) and it worked.
>
> I could also start from the console, so it seems to have a random
> element.
>
> Why did I need to start so soon? Because of a second panic.
>
> panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "len <= LINUX32_ELF_AUX_ENTRIES" failed:
> file "/archive/foreign/src/sys/compat/linux32/common/linux32_exec_elf32.c",
> line 244
> cpu7: Begin traceback...
> vpanic() at netbsd:vpanic+0x1cd
> kern_assert() at netbsd:kern_assert+0x5a
> linux32_elf32_copyargs() at netbsd:linux32_elf32_copyargs+0x407
...
> This happened during a bulk build, I guess building one of the suse
> packages. I'll retry.
Hmmm... these could be 'random' panics.
Might be worth looking for a latter working kernel.
Or look through the commits for something suspicious and try the other
side of it.
To even attempt to diagnose the crash we'd need a working kernel dump.
(Do those work on amd64 at the moment - if you are willing to wait
for the hours it takes to write out 16GB ...)
David
David
--
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index