Re: Failing tests: please try to address these soon

[Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>]

Should these 50 new failures be marked as XFAIL?  I think it's important
that we put (at least most) known to be broken tests as xfail so that
the failed count being high is a sign of a regression.

build: OK with 363358 lines of log, install: OK, tests: 3466 passed, 80 
skipped, 59 expected_failure, 5 failed, ATF output: raw, xml, html
commit 2013.06.26.19.29.24 reinoud src/tests/fs/common/Makefile 1.11
commit 2013.06.26.19.29.24 reinoud src/tests/fs/common/fstest_udf.c 1.1
commit 2013.06.26.19.29.24 reinoud src/tests/fs/common/h_fsmacros.h 1.38
build: OK with 364703 lines of log, install: OK, tests: 3465 passed, 80 
skipped, 59 expected_failure, 55 failed, ATF output: raw, xml, html