[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 08:28:48PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 02:38:00PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > All of the makes should be using the same job token queue, so should stop
> > as soon as the 'failed' token is inserted.
> > So you should only see one non-make fail for each possible parralel task.
> > (Of course, it could be buggy!)
> And a "local make" one for each directory recursion, I presume?
> The builds run with -j11 currently and (just for example)
In the cases I've run into a couple of times, the only errors in my
(pretty large) terminal scroll history are src/rescue bombing because
a failure has been detected elsewhere.
I'm not convinced that there isn't something wrong, but it definitely
doesn't strike all the time if so.
> Should we suppress the errror messages on recursion pops? They do
> not provide a lot of value (besides naming the make target causing
> the recursion).
Yes if we can figure out a decent way to do it that doesn't lose
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |