Re: pchb@acpi again

[Jukka Ruohonen <jruohonen%iki.fi@localhost>]

On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:32:29AM -0700, Chuck Silvers wrote:
> > Why not just probe _PRT in the match()? According to the spec, _PRT should
> > be mandatory for all PCI root bridges.
> 
> I'm confused... if we were to make pchb_acpi_match() fail to match when the
> root bridge device doesn't have a _PRT object, then how would you propose to
> support systems like mine where some of the PCI root bridge devices don't have
> _PRT objects?

You're right. Besides, the spec specifically speaks about _PRT being
required *under* the root bridges.

- Jukka.