[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: automatic stacktrace on panic, was: Re: Boot fail as kvm guest
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 08:05:23PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:09:02PM -0600, David Young wrote:
> > > that's not enough: you still miss the panic message.
> > That's a good point, however, can't we print the panic message again, or
> > else postpone printing it?
> if things go wrong when printing the stack trace, you also loose
> the panic message. that's the worse possible senario.
Why should anything go wrong when printing the stack trace? I realize
that, in practice, things *do* go wrong, but aren't these defects in our
stack trace code?
dyoung%pobox.com@localhost Urbana, IL (217) 721-9981
Main Index |
Thread Index |