Re: Problems with iwi0

[Riccardo Mottola <riccardo.mottola%libero.it@localhost>]

Hi David,

On 11/07/11 17:56, David Young wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:36:45PM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> > > netstat -r
> > >
> > >
> > > Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use
> > > Mtu Interface
> > > default            192.168.1.254      UGS         0        0      -  iwi0
> > > 127/8              localhost          UGRS        0        0  33192  lo0
> > > localhost          localhost          UH          2        0  33192  lo0
> > > 192.168.1/24       link#3             UC          1        0      -  bge0
> > > 192.168.1.156      localhost          UGHS        0        0  33192  lo0
> > > 192.168.1.254      00:30:0a:0b:75:7e  UHLc        1       36      -  bge0
> Hmm, the route to 192.168.1.254 goes through bge0.  That doesn't seem right.
indeed. Before running my wifi script and activating iwi0, I manually 
did "route delete" for the ethernet and the network. The wireless then 
worked.
Why do you think this is the correct behaviour? Usually on other 
computers and operating systems I do not need to either do anything 
(just activate the wireless) or, at most, "route delete default" which I 
execute also on NetBSD inside the script.
If it is fine, fine and I extend my script, I just want to know.

Thanks,  Riccardo