Re: HEADS UP: atf-0.14 imported

[Julio Merino <jmmv%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Julio Merino <jmmv%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> On 6/15/11 8:45 AM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 08:31:39AM +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
>>>>
>>>> At least the shell-based tests are likely failing because of ATF itself.
>>>
>>> What makes you think that?
>>
>> This is yet again pretty self-evident. The regression is among:
>
> Well, you didn't provide this data point before :-P  Anyway, I see some
> problems now.  Had had no coffee before.
>
> Some problems are caused by broken test programs that atf 0.14 has just
> uncovered (fixed already).  In other cases, like the libc tests, the
> breakage is a regression; thinking now what the best fix is.

Alright.  I think the breakage is all fixed.  According to the
dashboard, we are down to 4 broken tests again.

-- 
Julio Merino / @jmmv