Re: 5.99.41 kernel not compatible with 5.99.51 userspace

[Scott Solmonson <scosol%scosol.org@localhost>]

> Today I have accidentally booted 5.99.41 kernel on 5.99.51 userland

I think you've solved your problem :)
I'm a very recent subscriber to this list, so this is a genuine
question not meant to jab at anyone-
My understanding is that -CURRENT should be expected to not build/work
at times, and such things should be reported and talked about maybe
after finding a bug and seeing it not fixed in few day's worth of
snapshots-
But using a mismatched kernel and userland? Isn't that almost
effectively guaranteeing failure depending on what the differences
are, in a configuration not meant for any use whatsoever?
Is this accidental mishap something that I should report as well?

-SS

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Adam Hamsik <haaaad%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Today I have accidentally booted 5.99.41 kernel on 5.99.51 userland and I have
> found out that network stopped working at all here is small screen log.
>
> [haad@musasi ~]$ netstat -ant
> Active Internet connections (including servers)
> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q  Local Address          Foreign Address        State
> tcp        0     48  10.0.0.107.22          10.0.0.102.49355       ESTABLISHED
> tcp        0      0  *.80                   *.*                    LISTEN
> tcp        0      0  *.22                   *.*                    LISTEN
> udp        0      0  *.68                   *.*
> Active Internet6 connections (including servers)
> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q  Local Address          Foreign Address        (state)
> tcp6       0      0  *.80                   *.*                    LISTEN
> tcp6       0      0  *.22                   *.*                    LISTEN
> Active UNIX domain sockets
> Address  Type   Recv-Q Send-Q    Inode     Conn     Refs  Nextref Addr
> c48de280 dgram       0      0        0 c48de800        0 c48de480 -> 
> /var/run/log
> c48de480 dgram       0      0        0 c48de800        0        0 -> 
> /var/run/log
> c48de800 dgram       0      0 cf16cb78        0 c48de280        0 /var/run/log
> [haad@musasi ~]$ netstat -anr
> Routing tables
>
> Internet:
> Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use    Mtu Interface
> af 0: Q00          link#1             UC          2 14850924507773796352     
>  -  ???
> default            00:22:2d:41:7f:d7  UHLc        0 14850924507773796370     
>  -  ???
> (27) 
> Q7c.c4.58.b9.8e.c4.39.00.40.04.07.00.00.00.c4.b8.8e.c4.18.b8.8e.c4.20.62.8c.c4.05.24.00.00.01.00.00.00.a5.00.00.00.28.15.19.ce.00.9c.98.c4.00.00.00.00.a0.61.8c.c4.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00
>  00:1b:63:02:14:47  UHLc        1 14850924507773796517      -  ???
> netstat: kvm_read: Bad address
> 00:1b:63:02:14:47  127.0.0.1          UH          0 14162444239522234368     
>  -  /??
>
> AppleTalk:
> Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use    Mtu Interface
>
> Internet6:
> Destination                        Gateway                        Flags   
>  Refs      Use    Mtu Interface
> default            ::1                            UH          0 
> 14162444239522234368      -  `??
> af 0: Q00          link#1             UC          0 14850924507773796352     
>  -  ?J?
> default            20:cf:30:ba:2c:0c  UHL         0 14162444239522234368     
>  -  ?J?
> af 0: Q00          fe80::1%2                      U           0 
> 14162444239522234368      -  d??
> default            link#2             UHL         0 14162444239522234368     
>  -  d??
> af 0: Q00          link#1             UC          0 14850924507773796352     
>  -  ?J?
> af 0: Q00          ::1                            UC          0 
> 14162444239522234368      -  `??
> af 0: Q00          link#1             UC          0 14850924507773796352     
>  -  ?J?
> af 0: Q00          ::1                            UC          0 
> 14162444239522234368      -  `??
> [haad@musasi ~]$ ifconfig -a
> ifconfig: getifaddrs: No such file or directory
> [haad@musasi ~]$ uname -a
> NetBSD musasi.haad.chillisys.com 5.99.41 NetBSD 5.99.41 (GENERIC) #0: Tue Dec 
> 14 17:36:02 CET 2010 
>  buildbot%musasi.haad.chillisys.com@localhost:/usr/devel/buildslave/obj/i386/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
>  i386
>
> With new 5.99.51 kernel everything works fine. Does anyone has an idea what 
> might be wrong ?
>
> Regards
>
> Adam.
>
>



-- 
NUNQUAM NON PARATUS