Re: Git and ident of binaries

To: Thomas Adam <thomas.adam22%gmail.com@localhost>, David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>, NetBSD Source Repository Technical Discussion List <tech-repository%NetBSD.org@localhost>, NetBSD-current Users's Discussion List <current-users%NetBSD.org@localhost>, "S.P.Zeidler" <spz%serpens.de@localhost>
Subject: Re: Git and ident of binaries
From: Curt Sampson <cjs%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:32:40 +0900

On 2010-01-13 00:24 +0000 (Wed), David Laight wrote:

> You are missing the point. It isn't only CVS that uses the hierarchic
> sequential per-file version identifies, but also software developers.
> System wide versions serve an entirely different purpose.

Whether Thomas is or not, I'm certainly missing the point. What do you
need to do for which it isn't sufficient to know the path of the source
file and the "system-wide" version number of the commit from which that
binary was built?

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson         <cjs%cynic.net@localhost>         +81 90 7737 2974
             http://www.starling-software.com
The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism
by those who have not got it.    --George Bernard Shaw

References:
- Git and ident of binaries
  - From: Curt Sampson
- Re: Git and ident of binaries
  - From: Thomas Adam
- Re: Git and ident of binaries
  - From: David Laight

Prev by Date: Re: Problem building due to missing kmodule script
Next by Date: Asus EEE PC 1000H wireless support?
Previous by Thread: Re: Git and ident of binaries
Next by Thread: Asus EEE PC 1000H wireless support?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index