Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: RAIDframe mirror failure: Found(low mod_counter): wd5e at 0
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 07:33:23PM +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> After a wedge and reboot, one of my RAIDframe mirrors wasn't happy.
>
> In my boot messages I see:
>
> Found: wd4e at 1
> RAID autoconfigure
> Configuring raid1:
> Starting autoconfiguration of RAID set...
> Looking for 0 in autoconfig
> Found(low mod_counter): wd5e at 0
> Looking for 1 in autoconfig
> Found: wd4e at 1
> raid1: allocating 20 buffers of 65536 bytes.
> raid1: RAID Level 1
> raid1: Components: /dev/wd5e[**FAILED**] /dev/wd4e
> raid1: Total Sectors: 33554176 (16383 MB)
> raid1: configured ok
>
> and raidctl has this to say:
>
> thoreau 19> raidctl -s raid1
> Components:
> /dev/wd5e: failed
> /dev/wd4e: optimal
> No spares.
> /dev/wd5e status is: failed. Skipping label.
> Component label for /dev/wd4e:
> Row: 0, Column: 1, Num Rows: 1, Num Columns: 2
> Version: 2, Serial Number: 2001, Mod Counter: -1189456427
> Clean: No, Status: 0
> sectPerSU: 128, SUsPerPU: 1, SUsPerRU: 1
> Queue size: 100, blocksize: 512, numBlocks: 33554176
> RAID Level: 1
> Autoconfig: Yes
> Root partition: No
> Last configured as: raid1
> Parity status: DIRTY
> Reconstruction is 100% complete.
> Parity Re-write is 100% complete.
> Copyback is 100% complete.
>
> There are no read/write errors for wd5 and I was planning on doing a
> "raidctl -R /dev/wd5e raid1" to just rebuild in place, but thought I'd
> check here to see if there was anything else to check first.
'raidctl -R /dev/wd5e raid1' should work just fine. Recently I had to
recover from similar situation and thats exactly what Ive done.
Regards
--
Milos Negovanovic
milos.negovanovic%googlemail.com@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index