Re: i386 and the COMPAT_50 option

[mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)]

ad%NetBSD.org@localhost (Andrew Doran) writes:

>On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 04:56:03PM +0100, Quentin Garnier wrote:

>> Modules as a mean to save kernel size is a red herring anyway.

>I disagree because GENERIC is too fat to boot on my 486!

I am sure you have no problems to build a smaller kernel for
your system.

-- 
-- 
                                Michael van Elst
Internet: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."