Re: Shlib major bumps and UPDATE builds

[Havard Eidnes <he%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 01:36:15AM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
>   | Cool!  Any comment to that "add shlib_version as a dependency"
>   | part?  It's convenient, and should not really cause any changes
>   | to the effort of building or rebuilding.
>
> As long as that works for libraries that use the SHLIB_(MAJOR|MINOR|TEENY)
> variables in the Makefile instead of the shlib_version file.

That's fine, the DPADD+=${SHLIB_VERSION_FILE} is inside a

.if !defined(SHLIB_MAJOR) && exists(${SHLIB_VERSION_FILE})              # {

construct.  So...  While it doesn't really trigger a rebuild of
the shared lib for those libraries which do it that way, it's not
causing any build problems either.

Regards,

- Håvard