Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: is it 5.99.2 or 5.99.02 ?

On Nov 15, 2008, at 6:19 AM, Bernd Ernesti wrote:

[Including matt who changed it to 5.99.01]

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 02:22:32PM +0100, Adam Hoka wrote:
Zafer Aydo?an wrote:

hello list,

in the past kernel bumps were notated like 4.99.1 .. 4.99.9
now I'm seeing 5.99.01, 5.99.02.

Which one is correct ?

Cheers, Zafer.

I'm also interested.
file(1) still says 5.99.1.

Was this change intentional?

Matt, what was the reason to go to 5.99.01 instead of 5.99.1?

The comment isn't really used so it's actually 5.99.1.  it'll back
to two digits soon enough. :)

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index