Re: is it 5.99.2 or 5.99.02 ?

[Bernd Ernesti <veego%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

[Including matt who changed it to 5.99.01]

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 02:22:32PM +0100, Adam Hoka wrote:
> Zafer Aydo?an wrote:
> 
> > hello list,
> > 
> > in the past kernel bumps were notated like 4.99.1 .. 4.99.9
> > now I'm seeing 5.99.01, 5.99.02.
> > 
> > Which one is correct ?
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers, Zafer.
> 
> I'm also interested.
> file(1) still says 5.99.1.
> 
> Was this change intentional?

Matt, what was the reason to go to 5.99.01 instead of 5.99.1?

Bernd