Re: WAPBL patch for testing

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 09:55:06PM +0100, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> I don't know, what you intend to change -- we NEED the wapbl lock for
> GOP_WRITE() as it was before, when there was a ffs_gop_write() that did
> the same that genfs_putpages() does now.

I still don't think this is needed. Looking at your trace at least one
obvious question comes up. Why is ffs_write holding the WAPBL lock all
the time through the transaction? Isn't it enough to hold it over each
balloc_range call and do the actual ubc_uiomove without?

Joerg