[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: veriexecctl(8) segfaults when no argument is given
2008/9/2 Brett Lymn <blymn%baesystems.com.au@localhost>:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 11:43:30PM +0300, Stathis Kamperis wrote:
>> * I've come up with some locking issues. Veriexecctl goes into tstile
>> state and renders the whole system unusable, ie all processes
>> gradually become unresponsive and go into tstile state as well. It's
>> 100% reproducible for me (only) under X environment: run an xterm and
>> type 'veriexecctl load' a dozen consecutive times until it hangs. I'll
>> come back with a useful trace.
> Interesting. I would like to see the traces from this. Can you try
> running a kernel with LOCKDEBUG to get some information about the
> locking? It sounds like processes are piling up on a held lock.
Hi Brett and congratulations for the innovative work you've done along
with the much missed Elad.
I've built a kernel with LOCKDEBUG enabled and here is the panic along
with the backtrace.
(Note that without LOCKDEBUG I was able to start X and I had to run
veriexecctl in order to reproduce the problem.)
Main Index |
Thread Index |