[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: BNX Double Buffer Allocation
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 01:28:44PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 03:29:33PM -0700, Aaron J. Grier wrote:
> > this opposed to the current situation of wedging the network stack
> > and requiring a reboot to get it back? the result of killing
> > connections is the same in both cases!
> No reboot needed when I see it, the box recover by itself when the
> stalled TCP connections time out ... so yes, in my case it's better to
> let the TCP mechanism time out conections that are really dead,
> instead of dropping active connections.
you're lucky. I've been completely wedged for hours at a time. a panic
and reboot would be less disruptive.
is there any way to find out how many buffers each connection is using?
a combination of netstat -a and -m?
this is all still assuming it is an mbuf issue and something else. I
still don't know what else draws from mclpool.
Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." |
Main Index |
Thread Index |