[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Supported RAID SATA cards
In article <9A667A20-8EA6-4EBE-AEE4-E2C5D737C68F%johani.org@localhost>,
Johan Ihren <johani%johani.org@localhost> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>On 13 Aug 2008, at 18:05, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:35:13AM -0500, M Graff wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> I need to purchase a 4-port (or more) serial SATA RAID card for a
>>> I'm building. Any recommendations?
>>> Ideally, it should be something I can check from NetBSD while it is
>>> running, and swap drives in and out as needed.
>> I have 2 servers running with 2 8-port 3ware 9550sx each. I'm quite
>> happy with them (under NetBSD 3.x), and can be controller from
>> NetBSD using the tw_cli FreeBSD binary.
>I'm also using a (4-port) 3ware 9550sx, it has served me well and in
>particular the tw_cli utility is very useful. My only complaint is
>that the card is clearly optimised for a small number of simultaneous
>IO streams. I.e. in my case, using this on a Xen DOM0 with DOMUs that
>I sometimes use for students, everything is great when I have 4 DOMUs
>compiling (i.e. lots of writes) but if I have 12 DOMUs running,
>performance is not 1/3 but rather 1/15.
>When I compare this to an Adaptec I had before then the 3ware is much
>better (faster) for a few streams, but the Adaptec, albeit slower
>overall, had a less pronounced "performace knee" when adding DOMUs.
>But then, all RAID cards are compromises of course. Next time I will
>probably test an Areca, but I don't know if they can be controlled as
>well from NetBSD as the 3ware with tw_cli.
Areca is the way to go and it is controlled natively bia bioctl.
I also have a patch that ports the current code to NetBSD 4 that
I am planning to have pulled up once it is verified that it works.
In my tests it beats both megaraid and 3ware.
Main Index |
Thread Index |