Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: select/poll bug?

To: current-users%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: select/poll bug?
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:28:00 +0200

On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 10:09:54PM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> Lets say that select can handle a greater timeframe them as it's time_t
> is in seconds, vs an int as milliseconds for poll.

Doesn't really matter. You have to deal with preliminary wakeups anyway,
so you just have to round down to the largest possible timeout.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: select/poll bug?
  - From: Roy Marples

References:
- Re: select/poll bug?
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: select/poll bug?
  - From: Roy Marples
- Re: select/poll bug?
  - From: David Brownlee
- Re: select/poll bug?
  - From: Roy Marples
- Re: select/poll bug?
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: select/poll bug?
  - From: Roy Marples

Prev by Date: Re: HEAD amd64 kernel no boot
Next by Date: Re: select/poll bug?
Previous by Thread: Re: select/poll bug?
Next by Thread: Re: select/poll bug?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index