Re: -current postfix breakage? (on sparc64)

[Rafal Boni <rafal%pobox.com@localhost>]

Erik Fair wrote:
 > Wietse Venema would be horrified to see postfix described as 
"bloatware"
> - that's one of the things he tried hard to optimize, particularly in 
> contrast to sendmail. I'd bet quite a bit that there's something else 
> going on here which is causing postfix to ask for 0xb6891000000 bytes of 
> RAM.

Erik wins the prize; incorrect types passed to the sockopt code were the 
culprit.  Thanks to Christos for fixing it before my coffee has sunk in :)

--rafal