[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ghostscript and jemalloc
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Potentially is is a bug with ghostscript and gets exposed by
> jemalloc. Simon found a similar bug in pax recently. It seems that
> jemalloc causes more activity on freed memory.
Yes, I'm quite willing to believe that the bug is in ghostscript and I
have an open bug about it at bugs.ghostscript.com (#689711) but it
would be useful to confirm that other people are seeing the bug.
Main Index |
Thread Index |