[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Asus EeePC Wifi Support
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:43:25AM +0000, Stephen Borrill wrote:
I think we could do with restructuring ath and contrib/dev/ath so that an
alternative HAL and (if necessary) a struct translatation layer can be
specified. This means that we could specify a different HAL (the HAL in your
patch requires has the relevant struct re-arranged) in a kernel config file
(in a similar way to specifying a different vesafs splashscreen), e.g.
Whilst I can understand your concern, I'm not sure we should be
encouraging multiple HALs to be in the tree at once. Keeping
the ath code up to date is pain enough without introducing extra
maintenance costs of having more than one (non-backwards
compatible) versions of it.
I wouldn't say that it's encouraging it. Atheros clearly have no qualms in
releasing incompatible HALs and at the moment, I can't use the same tree
to build kernels for standard in-tree ath devices as well as for my EeePC.
This wouldn't be introducing extra versions to maintain in the tree. It
would be allowing someone who had an extra, non-compatible version to drop
it in without causing them too much grief.
I'll just say that the latest madwifi release (0.9.4) from 13/2/08
mentions the lack of AR5007 support under "Known Issues" and has
a link to the experimental patch for i386. So, I'm assuming that
support for this chipset must be in reasonable demand and that
it'll appear in a release at some point.
That's good news!
Main Index |
Thread Index |