Re: cp -n diff

[Adam Hoka <adam.hoka%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Thu, 5 May 2011 12:23:57 +0200
Marc Balmer <marc%msys.ch@localhost> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> Am 05.05.2011 um 10:15 schrieb David Holland 
> <dholland-tech%NetBSD.org@localhost>:
> 
> > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:53:06AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> >> So, if -n is to be rejected from cp, which I think it should be, then
> >> -l should be removed as well, it hasn't been there long enough yet for
> >> it to be any kind of real backward compatability issue.
> > 
> > I agree; cp -l shouldn't have been added.
> > 
> 
> I fully agree and I am all for the removal of -l
> Please before it makes it into a release....
> 

I agree...

-- 
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability