Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t

[Anthony Mallet <anthony.mallet%useless-ficus.net@localhost>]

Mindaugas R. writes:
| For compatibility purposes we can rename it to cpu_set_t. Anyone see a
| potential problem with this?

Hi,

I come back on this ...
I think that nobody raised an objection?

My problem is that ACE (http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html) does
not compile out of the box right now. The configure checks for the
pthread_setaffinity_np() function and if it finds it, it then wants to
call it with a cpu_set_t parameter.

Of course that's not NetBSD fault at all, but it would be nice if I
hadn't to make some specific patch just for that :)

-- 
Cheers,
Anthony