Re: swap-on-raidframe vs raidctl -P

[der Mouse <mouse%Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA@localhost>]

> See <http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2005/05/09/0001.html> for
> my proposal from 2005.

That appears to depend on order of configuring to reverse to provide a
successful order of unconfiguring.  This works in almost all cases, but
not quite all; consider something-on-RAID, with a vnd on that something
hot-added to the RAID.  (This isn't really useful; except in some very
peculiar special cases, it'll infinite-recurse when the RAID gets used.
But it's an example of how the hierarchy can end up loopy.)

/~\ The ASCII                           der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML               mouse%rodents.montreal.qc.ca@localhost
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B