Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*

["Aaron J. Grier" <agrier%poofygoof.com@localhost>]

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 04:39:33PM +0000, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> What you propose essentially means maintaining about any combination
> of those MK/USE settings.  So yes, it is complicating, and even done
> right, I'm sure it will turn out to be a lot of work, and
> unfortunately, not just for you.

isn't it correct release engineering to ensure that all combinations of
MK variables are regularly built and tested?  it's what, only ~2^40
different combinations?  :)

-- 
  Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | 
agrier%poofygoof.com@localhost