Re: state of QT6 and plans?

[Mark Davies <mark%ecs.vuw.ac.nz@localhost>]

On 05/11/2025 09:28, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Is the metapackage there
>    - to test building qt6 (but not everythign that depends on it)?
>    - for people building source code (not in pkgsrc) that wants qt6?
>    - convenience for people maintaining qt6 in pkgsrc?
>    - some oether reason?


That would be an Adam question.

> Sounds good.  I wonder if the repo it is using will have changes pushed
> upstream so we can get back on the regular path, or if I'm misreading.

I think you are misreading.  Should just be pulling the standard 
qtwebengine.


cheers
mark