Re: print-PLIST and options

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Aleksey Cheusov <vle%gmx.net@localhost> writes:

>> tl;dr: I'm not hugely fussed if you want to add them, the patch for
>> automatic handling looks reasonable at first glance, but if the work
>> results in any broken package updates I will be very very sad.
>
> I already implemented proposal by Thomas Klausner. That is, print-PLIST
> prints ${PLIST.nls} only is option "nls" already exists. So this patch
> doesn't break anything.

I think the question is not about the patch, but about the practice of
adding nls to vast numbers of packages, and having done so without
proposing and discussing.