Re: Substitute for git-package.mk in pkgsrc proper?

To: Paul Ripke <stix%stix.id.au@localhost>
Subject: Re: Substitute for git-package.mk in pkgsrc proper?
From: Tobias Nygren <tnn%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 14:29:07 +0100

On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 00:20:25 +1100
Paul Ripke <stix%stix.id.au@localhost> wrote:

> Thoughts about the name? "occt" is here and there, but not immediately
> obvious. And FreeBSD ports calls it "cad/opencascade"...

The package replaced an earlier package named cad/oce. There have been
historically multiple forks of this software. OCCT fully distinguishes
which distribution it is. cad/opencascade-technology seemed excessively
long.

-Tobias

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Substitute for git-package.mk in pkgsrc proper?
  - From: Paul Ripke

References:
- Substitute for git-package.mk in pkgsrc proper?
  - From: Paul Ripke
- Re: Substitute for git-package.mk in pkgsrc proper?
  - From: Tobias Nygren
- Re: Substitute for git-package.mk in pkgsrc proper?
  - From: Paul Ripke

Prev by Date: Re: Substitute for git-package.mk in pkgsrc proper?
Next by Date: Re: Cert validation in pkg_add
Previous by Thread: Re: Substitute for git-package.mk in pkgsrc proper?
Next by Thread: Re: Substitute for git-package.mk in pkgsrc proper?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index