tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Broken implicit DEPENDS?



On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 11:29:54PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 10:18:15PM +0000, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
> > The bulk build still has a few thousand packages to go, but the ones it has
> > found so far are:
> > 
> >   https://gist.github.com/jperkin/cf003b2582b2325de084948be2d6384f
> > 
> > Prior to my change, only eterm was flagged as broken.
> 
> I took a look at one of them, p5-ap24-libapreq2, from www/p5-libapreq2.
> 
> It is in the list as:
> p5-ap24-libapreq2-2.17nb1/install.log:ERROR: /opt/pkg/lib/libapr-1.so.0: apr-1.7.4 is not a runtime dependency
> p5-ap24-libapreq2-2.17nb1/install.log:ERROR: /opt/pkg/lib/libaprutil-1.so.0: apr-util-1.6.3nb3 is not a runtime dependency
> p5-ap24-libapreq2-2.17nb1/install.log:ERROR: /opt/pkg/lib/libexpat.so.1: expat-2.5.0 is not a runtime dependency
> 
> I built the binary package, deleted everything and ran pkg_add on it
> -- and it pulled in expat and apr-util and apr. So this looks ok to me.
> 
> Is this a false positive?

Same for audio/libfishsound, listed as
libfishsound-1.0.0nb4/install.log:ERROR: /opt/pkg/lib/libFLAC.so.12: flac-1.4.3 is not a runtime dependency

but after 'pkg_add libfishsound' I have flac installed.
 Thomas


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index