Re: Broken implicit DEPENDS?

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%gatalith.at@localhost>]

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 10:18:15PM +0000, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
> The bulk build still has a few thousand packages to go, but the ones it has
> found so far are:
> 
>   https://gist.github.com/jperkin/cf003b2582b2325de084948be2d6384f
> 
> Prior to my change, only eterm was flagged as broken.

I took a look at one of them, p5-ap24-libapreq2, from www/p5-libapreq2.

It is in the list as:
p5-ap24-libapreq2-2.17nb1/install.log:ERROR: /opt/pkg/lib/libapr-1.so.0: apr-1.7.4 is not a runtime dependency
p5-ap24-libapreq2-2.17nb1/install.log:ERROR: /opt/pkg/lib/libaprutil-1.so.0: apr-util-1.6.3nb3 is not a runtime dependency
p5-ap24-libapreq2-2.17nb1/install.log:ERROR: /opt/pkg/lib/libexpat.so.1: expat-2.5.0 is not a runtime dependency

I built the binary package, deleted everything and ran pkg_add on it
-- and it pulled in expat and apr-util and apr. So this looks ok to me.

Is this a false positive?
 Thomas