Re: cmake/build.mk?

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 08:05:24AM +0000, nia wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 09:14:28PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 08:24:43PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 08:17:18PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > > > I see that meson has a build.mk that defines the necessary override
> > > > targets. cmake on the other hand is in mk with a USE_CMAKE setting
> > > > (that mostly pulls in the dependency and some cmake default args).
> > > 
> > > I see cmake more as alternative to autoconf, so having it behave like
> > > GNU_CONFIGURE sounds more sensible to me.
> > 
> > meson is also an alternative to autoconf...
> >  Thomas
> 
> I assumed they were handled differently because pkgsrc assumes
> a "configure" implementation uses make, while meson uses ninja.

I'd like to (optionally) use ninja with cmake as well...
 Thomas