Re: PKG_DEVELOPER=yes [Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/lang/zig]

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost> writes:

>> So you think it's ok to have the same rules for
>> 
>>   user builds something
>>   user runs pbulk without setting options
>>   TNF build cluster runs pbulk
>> 
>> and if so that's what I  was ttrying to say.
>
> "Official" builds should include all reasonable checks, even those we
> know require additional dependencies and some processing time. I still
> stand with PKG_DEVELOPER=yes should be used here. But, that's not a
> policy I want to dictate for everyone. The interpreter warnings for
> example do have a good chance of being irrevelant in many environments.
> Same for the permission checks.

Now I understand you, I think.   And you disagree with Jonathan.

But I think everybody agrees that we can and should cause inexpesnive,
no-additonal-dependency checks currently only enabled in PKG_DEVELOPER
to be always enabled.  Correct?