[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: PKG_DEVELOPER=yes [Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/lang/zig]
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost> writes:
>> So you think it's ok to have the same rules for
>> user builds something
>> user runs pbulk without setting options
>> TNF build cluster runs pbulk
>> and if so that's what I was ttrying to say.
> "Official" builds should include all reasonable checks, even those we
> know require additional dependencies and some processing time. I still
> stand with PKG_DEVELOPER=yes should be used here. But, that's not a
> policy I want to dictate for everyone. The interpreter warnings for
> example do have a good chance of being irrevelant in many environments.
> Same for the permission checks.
Now I understand you, I think. And you disagree with Jonathan.
But I think everybody agrees that we can and should cause inexpesnive,
no-additonal-dependency checks currently only enabled in PKG_DEVELOPER
to be always enabled. Correct?
Main Index |
Thread Index |