tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: package version numbering change



On 11.09.2019 02:03, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> writes:
> 
>> Hello,
>> upstream for geography/opencpn-plugin-watchdog changed, and there is
>> now properly tagged releases. So I'd like to switch to new upstream
>> and use release tags. But this would mean that the package version would
>> go from 20190228 to 2.4.6.
>>
>> Won't the pkg tools think that 2.4.6 is older than 20190228 ?
>> If so what's the best way to deal with this ?
> 
> My vote is just to do this, and blame any manual work people have to do
> on upstream.  I supsect it's not a lot of total effort (pkg_delete,
> pkg_add the new one, once) times not a lot of people, and that seems
> better than baggage from some epoch scheme forever.
> 
> A lesson, not really obvious, is that perhaps when there isn't a
> release, the pkgsrc version should be
> 
> 0.0.YYYYMMDD
> 
> or something that's likely to be less than any released version.
> 

EPOCH is still a missing feature in pkgsrc and it could handle this.

It is required especially for binary packages and upgrades.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index