Wip and tech-pkg, was: ADMIN: please do not crosspost, list purpose

[Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-usenet2012%yahoo.com@localhost>]

On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 13:48, Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost> wrote:
>
> We have two discussion lists for pkgsrc, and there has been a signifcant
> amount of crossposting, which defeats the purpose of separation.
>
> Please do not crosspost to pkgsrc-users and tech-pkg.  If you are
> tempted to crosspost, or unsure which list to choose, please use only
> pkgsrc-users.  If you reply to a crosspost, please trim to one list when
> replying.
>
> tech-pkg is for discussion of proposed changes to files under pkgsrc/mk
> and structural, wide-ranging, or high-consequence issues within pkgsrc.
> (It is understood that the line between pkgsrc-users and tech-pkg is a
> bit hard to draw, and that's ok.)

Quick question: if a topic is about modifying or cloning a package in
wip AND the package has pkgsrc-users%netbsd.org@localhost as its maintainer,
which list would the topic fit? (I remember asking a similar question
5 years ago when I cloned Abiword but I can't recall what the
consensus was)

-- 
Ottavio Caruso