tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers

To: tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
From: Edgar Fuß <ef%math.uni-bonn.de@localhost>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:33:02 +0200

> .if empty(PKGPATH:Mlang/gcc48) && \
[...]
> GCC_REQD+=4.8
> .endif  # GCC_REQD
Is it possible to use this only for C++? I.e.:

1. Is USE_LANGUAGES defined at this point?

2. Does it work for a C++ binary compiled with a pkgsrc 4.8.5 gcc to use a 
   C library compiled with a base 4.5.3?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
  - From: Jason Bacon

References:
- Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
  - From: coypu
- Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
  - From: Jason Bacon
- Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
  - From: coypu
- Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
  - From: Jason Bacon

Prev by Date: Re: License Issue for R-Packages
Next by Date: 'to_string' is not a member of 'std'
Previous by Thread: Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
Next by Thread: Re: Once more, C++11 and older 'base' compilers
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index