Re: new license?

[Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:20:55AM +0900, SODA Noriyuki wrote:
> He is saying:
> 	I think the best thing is to remove the 4th clause.
> 	It seesm the reason why the 4th clause was added was
> 	because the advertising clause was very common at that age.
> 	I'll make contact with IIJ, and ask them to release a
> 	license-modified version at github or somewhere.
> 
> So, stay tuned.

Perhaps in the meantime I could commit the package with unspecifed
licence?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu%netbsd.org@localhost