[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Are there regular bulk builds with PKGSRC_RUN_TEST=yes?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 16.01.2016 09:22, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
> * On 2016-01-16 at 03:18 GMT, Roland Illig wrote:
>> I am running NetBSD 7.0/amd64 inside a VirtualBox, and I ran into
>> an issue that Go programs cannot be profiled. When I opened a bug
>> against Go, I've been told that it sounded very unlikely.
>> Therefore, I rebuilt all my local pkgsrc installation using
>> PKGSRC_RUN_TEST=yes. The result of that was that many packages
>> fail now during their self-tests, even ones like lang/perl5,
>> devel/libtool-base, devel/libidn and several others that are
>> needed for basic operation.
>> Now I wonder when these self-tests have been run the last time
>> Does anyone run bulk builds regularly having PKGSRC_RUN_TEST=yes
>> in their mk.conf, and if so, what are the results?
> Yes, I run them weekly on SmartOS. As expected the results are
> mostly useless, e.g.:
> Help to fix this would be appreciated.
While there, is it fine to assume that test target dependencies are in
the group of build dependencies?
For example devel/gmake requires Perl to run tests, is it fine to add
it as USE_TOOLS += perl:build?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Main Index |
Thread Index |