wip/iverilog

[Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I packaged iverilog (Icarus Verilog) for inclusion into pkgsrc. After
the fact I noted that there was already a package under name verilog
[1] and it was Icarus.

wip/iverilog was tested by coypu@ with ivtest [2]. It gave the
following results:
Total=2170, Passed=2154, Failed=14, Not Implemented=2, Expected Fail=0

When I look into wip/verilog-current I don't understand whether the
changes and patches are needed, since upstream isn't installing them.

Also the name of the package isn't verbose, doesn't suggest that it's
Icarus variation.

My proposition is to upgrade pkgsrc version with Icarus Verilog from
wip/iverilog and optionally pull in modifications from
wip/verilog-current.

Do we need 4 packages with the same tool, but different name? Can we
obsolete them and stick to stable and optionally -git version?

Can we stick to new iverilog name? For me 'verilog' is like name
'editor' for an editor.

Thank you!

[1]
cad/verilog
cad/verilog-current
wip/verilog-current
wip/verilog08

[2] https://github.com/steveicarus/ivtest
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=9Xhp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----