[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: gpg1 vs gpg2
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>, Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 22:18:39 +0200
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 08:11:58PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:28:13 +0000
>> From: Benedek Gergely <i3enedek%neomailbox.net@localhost>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 06:05:19PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 03:42:12PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>> > > gpg1 actually still works without unnecessary broken moving parts.
>> > What Taylor said, using gpg1 is much less stressful for the casual
>> > user...
>> I'd say most of the pain is down to pinentry.
>> gpg2 is unusable without working pinentry, so that's a bit of a moot
> Yeah, it's especially annoying that passing a password file no longer
> works etc.
You need '--passphrase-file' or '--passphrase-fd' option of gpg2?
And if you want to use same passphrase interface, you can use
My ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf is here.
Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost
PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3
Main Index |
Thread Index |