Re: gpg1 vs gpg2

[Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost>]

Hi,

From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>, Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 22:18:39 +0200

> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 08:11:58PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>>    Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:28:13 +0000
>>    From: Benedek Gergely <i3enedek%neomailbox.net@localhost>
>> 
>>    On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 06:05:19PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>>    > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 03:42:12PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>>    > > gpg1 actually still works without unnecessary broken moving parts.
>>    > 
>>    > What Taylor said, using gpg1 is much less stressful for the casual
>>    > user...
>> 
>>    I'd say most of the pain is down to pinentry.
>> 
>> gpg2 is unusable without working pinentry, so that's a bit of a moot
>> point.
> 
> Yeah, it's especially annoying that passing a password file no longer
> works etc.

You need '--passphrase-file' or '--passphrase-fd' option of gpg2?
And if you want to use same passphrase interface, you can use
pinentry-tty.

My ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf is here.

pinentry-program /usr/pkg/bin/pinentry-tty
no-grab
default-cache-ttl 1800

--
Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost
PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB  FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3