[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/security/gnupg2
From: Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>, Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:42:46 -0400
> Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost> writes:
>> Is there any reason to depend on curses-based pinentry only?
>> For example, in thunderbird enigmail case,
>> pinentry-gtk2 works however curses-based pinentry does not work for me.
>> MESSAGE or other documentation file should suggest pinentry* packages
I do not find official usage about MESSAGE file yet.
> In general, I view the use of MESSAGES as a bug. It was originally for
> exceptional situations where the machine admin had to do something, and
> it's grown into a substitute for documentation.
>> I know gnupg2 package has the dependency to pinentry.
>> i believe gnupg2 should not have pinentry dependency.
> I can see your point, in that gnupg2 is usable without it, and if one
> has pinentry-gtk2, there may be no need for many situations.
> However, the real reason to avoid gnupg2 depending on pinentry-gtk2 is that it
> requires gtk2, which is big.
> The pinentry package is 136K (netbsd-6 i386), and it only depends on
> things already required by gnupg2. So I don't think it hurts enough to
> remove it. If pinentry-gtk2 and pinentry-qt4 could be added for 150K
> each of footprint, I'd be in favor. But pinentry-gtk2 and dependencies
> is 65MB, and pinentry-qt4 is 98 MB.
> All that said, because thunderbird is a gtk thing, not a qt thing,
> having the enigmail plugin depend on pinentry-gtk2 seems reasonable.
I will keep pinentry dependency.
And I will add pinentry-gtk2 dependency to *-enigmail.
> Sort of realted, are we at the point where the gnupg2 package should
> build gpg, and gpg 1 should be deprecated? I'm not clear on why we are
> still using gpg1.
I believe gpg2 will work fine for many users.
Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost
PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3
Main Index |
Thread Index |