Re: s/gnome2/mate + gnome3 ?

To: Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: s/gnome2/mate + gnome3 ?
From: Patrick Welche <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 19:25:03 +0100

On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 11:33:22AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> 
> Does MATE conflict in naming with gnome2?  It seems the mate packages
> that were in wip had different names.

It should not conflict with gnome N.

> I am curious if anyone is still using our gnome2 packages,

Yes, as gnome 3 is incomplete.

> and if they'd just switch to MATE were it available.

Yes, and if you got MATE working, you would solve the problems in the
way of getting gnome 3 working.

Cheers,

Patrick

References:
- s/gnome2/mate + gnome3 ?
  - From: rodent
- Re: s/gnome2/mate + gnome3 ?
  - From: Greg Troxel

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal: remove shells/bash2
Next by Date: Re: s/gnome2/mate + gnome3 ?
Previous by Thread: Re: s/gnome2/mate + gnome3 ?
Next by Thread: Re: s/gnome2/mate + gnome3 ?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index