tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Perl5 update

Am 30.05.2014 um 02:42 schrieb OBATA Akio <>:

> On Fri, 30 May 2014 08:05:18 +0900, Thomas Klausner 
> <> wrote:
>>> and prove each p5-* module against requiring removed modules from core 
>>> (Module::Build, CGI, ...)?
>> There's no automation for that yet, so we'll fix these as we find
>> them.
> Those module are not removed yet, just marked as deprecated

True - I was mislead by behavior of last blead/release ...
Those modules were marked depreciated in blead and got removed with 1st release.

> Should we prevent warnings?

Nope, we should prefer dedicated packages for CPAN versions of the modules (as 
we do already for Module::Build).
Regarding to Saywer X statement " must die" (in favor of Catalyst, 
Dancer, Mojo, ...) I don't check CGI to often, so sorry for filtering it :)

> And following also should be done:

Some say so, some say just add a comment.
In I meanwhile do comments of the 
recommended line.

> Update CONFLICTS in lang/perl5/Makefile.
> Check packages marked as "older for.." core module may be sufficient now.

This would have been a nice approval whether P::U does that nicely out of the 
I see how far I come using a not updated git-clone ;)

Jens Rehsack

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index