Re: pkg_summary out of date due to Unrecognized archive format

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:14:37AM -0600, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> 
> > > But on the official ftp server, midori and firefox, firefox10, and 
> > > firefox36 do exist. But the pkg_summary doesn't list.
> > > 
> > > There is a mix of packages.
> > 
> > So it's a problem on the ftp server, it's out of sync with the official
> > source. I guess there's a missing --delete in a rsync comamnd line.
> 
> That is a temporary fix (and maybe the best fix), but won't solve it 
> until a policy is followed.
> 
> How do we restrict others from adding packages to same repo? (Like 
> packages from pomegranate.tastylime.net.)
> 
> How do we restrict others from replacing the pkg_summary database? (Like 
> I did.)

This is something for admins@, I guess. 

> 
> We do know where individual packages came from. +BUILD_INFO has 
> BUILD_HOST. But maybe should have some statement about the collection as 
> a whole.
> 
> And also since the original comments I saw were about firefox and 
> midori, what can we do to make sure thay are built?

Look at the pbulk report from the pkgbuild hosts I post to
pkgsrc-bulk%NetBSD.org@localhost

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--