tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: u_intX_t vs. uintX_t

To: Packages Technical List NetBSD Discussion <tech-pkg%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: u_intX_t vs. uintX_t
From: Georg Schwarz <georg.schwarz%freenet.de@localhost>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 20:23:56 +0200

Am 02.07.2012 um 02:48 schrieb Steven Drake:

> Thats my point exactly, how to fix it _properly_.

would an appropriate CPPFLAGS.SunOS+=-D... help?


-- 
Georg Schwarz  http://home.pages.de/~schwarz/
georg.schwarz%freenet.de@localhost +49 170 8768585

References:
- u_intX_t vs. uintX_t
  - From: Steven Drake
- Re: u_intX_t vs. uintX_t
  - From: Greg Troxel
- Re: u_intX_t vs. uintX_t
  - From: Steven Drake
- Re: u_intX_t vs. uintX_t
  - From: Hans Rosenfeld
- Re: u_intX_t vs. uintX_t
  - From: Steven Drake

Prev by Date: Announcing pkgsrc-2012Q2
Next by Date: proper way to handle ICONV_TRANSLIT on NetBSD (and other platforms)
Previous by Thread: Re: u_intX_t vs. uintX_t
Next by Thread: Re: u_intX_t vs. uintX_t
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index