tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: bulk vs. options vs. buildlink <> schrieb:
> However, future care would be required when adding optional
> dependencies to built-in packages. The second approach appears
> safer but might be complicated, as one would have to make sure that
> dependencies of built-ins also appearing as true dependencies are
> buildlinked.

BTW, do indirect dependencies need to be buildlinked at all, as
seems to be the case at the moment?

(mk/ iterates over _BLNK_PACKAGES, which contains
direct and indirect dependencies.)


Dennis den Brok

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index