Re: cpp in OS X, information needed

[Julio Merino <jmmv%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
<joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 01:28:28PM +0000, Julio Merino wrote:
>> Well, yes and no.  If we change the default conditionally, we add
>> complexity for no real gain (unless someone steps up and tests that
>> things still work in ancient versions).  Plus, if we are going to use
>> this change to fix libtool (instead of my workaround in f2c), we'd be
>> leaving out old OS X versions broken anyway, thus only fixing part of
>> the problem.
>
> Indepent of everything else, f2c should call the preprocessor in a way
> that works. I think using "gcc -x c -E" is preferable for GCC...

Hm, I think adding "-x c" to our current default should be enough and
would work.

-- 
Julio Merino